高级检索

    燃气管道两种极性排流器服役性能对比

    Comparison of Service Performance of Two Polarized Electric Drainagers in Gas Pipeline

    • 摘要: 为缓解地铁直流干扰,城市燃气管道多采用牺牲阳极与极性排流器组合的缓解措施。利用实验室测试和现场测试相结合的方法对比研究了肖特基二极管+电容+浪涌保护器型(1号)和金属氧化物半导体场效应晶体管(MOSFET)+电容+浪涌保护器型(2号)两种极性排流器的服役性能。通过现场测试获得了两种极性排流器对管道动态直流干扰和交流干扰排流效果和作用机制。结果表明:2号极性排流器的排流效果更好,但1号极性排流器反向绝缘性能更好;两种极性排流器连接排流地床均对管道直流干扰与交流干扰具有缓解作用,且2号极性排流器缓解效果更优。

       

      Abstract: In order to alleviate the DC interference of subway, the combination of sacrificial anodes and polarized electric drainagers is often used in urban gas pipelines. The service performance of two polarized electric drainagers, Schottky diode+capacitor+surge protector type (No.1) and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET)+capacitor+surge protector type (No.2), was compared using a combination of laboratory testing and field testing. The effect and mechanism of the two polarized electric drainager under the dynamic DC interference and AC interference were obtained through field tests. The results show that the polarized electric drainager No.1 had a better drainage effect than that of the polarized electric drainager No.2, but the polarized electric drainager No.2 had better reverse insulation performance than that of the polarized electric drainager No.1. Both polarized electric drainagers connecting with drainage bed had a mitigating effect on pipeline DC interference and AC interference, and the polarized electric drainager No.2 had a better mitigating effect than that of No.1.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回