• 中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库收录期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库来源期刊
Advanced Search
FENG Ziyan, CUI Mingwei. Equivalent Area Factor of Tangential Projection Method for Description of Pipeline Corrosion[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2019, 40(12): 916-924. DOI: 10.11973/fsyfh-201912010
Citation: FENG Ziyan, CUI Mingwei. Equivalent Area Factor of Tangential Projection Method for Description of Pipeline Corrosion[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2019, 40(12): 916-924. DOI: 10.11973/fsyfh-201912010

Equivalent Area Factor of Tangential Projection Method for Description of Pipeline Corrosion

More Information
  • Received Date: May 08, 2018
  • Taking the corrosion of production fluid pipelines, water injection pipelines and external oil pipelines in oil well as research object, the relationships between corrosion depth, length, width, corrosion morphology and corrosion tangential projection area of nearly 100 pipelines were statistically analyzed. According to the characteristics of corrosion depth, length, width and corrosion morphology, four methods for the classification of corrosion morphology as well as the range of values and calculation methods of various corrosion tangential projection area factors were proposed. Combined with the critical value of 3.5 mm of corrosion depth, 40 mm of corrosion length and four types of corrosion morphology, a new and more accurate method for the value of equivalent area factor was given. The results calculated by ASMEB 31G-1991 and ASME B31G-2009 using the new equivalent area factor were superior to those using fixed area factor in terms of the sum of the residual square and the error distribution stability. It was shown that the adaptability and accuracy of the newly proposed pipeline corrosion tangential projection equivalent area factor were better than the specified values of ASME B31G-1991 and ASME B31G-2009.
  • [1]
    American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipeline: ASME B31G-1991[S]. New York: ASME B31 Committee, 1991.
    [2]
    American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipeline: ASME B31G-2009[S]. New York: ASME B31 Committee, 2009.
    [3]
    钢质管道管体腐蚀损伤评价方法:SY/T 6151-2009[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2009.
    [4]
    Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures: BS 7910-2005[S]. London: British Standards Institution, 2005.
    [5]
    Submarine Pipeline Systems: DNV. OS-F101[S]. Oslo: Det Norske Veritas, 2007.
    [6]
    崔铭伟. 多相流海管CO2内腐蚀及剩余强度研究[D]. 青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2014.
    [7]
    崔铭伟,曹学文,封子艳. 腐蚀坑形貌对油气管道失效压力的影响[J]. 船舶力学, 2014, 18(Z1): 124-131.
    [8]
    帅健, 张春娥, 陈福来. 非线性有限元法用于腐蚀管道失效压力预测[J]. 石油学报, 2008, 29(6):933-937.
    [9]
    帅健. 管线力学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010:19-25.
    [10]
    BENJAMIN A C, VIEIRA R D, FREIRE J L F, et al. Burst tests on pipeline with long external corrosion[C]//Proceedings of ASME Conference on 2000 3rd International Pipeline Conference.Calgary, Canada: ASME, 2000.
    [11]
    CRONIN D S, PICK R J. Experimental database for corroded pipe: evaluation of RSTRENG and B31G[C]//Proceedings of ASME Conference on 2000 3rd International Pipeline Conference.Calgary, Canada:ASME,2000.
    [12]
    曹楚南. 腐蚀电化学原理[M]. 3版. 北京: 化学工业出版社,2008.
    [13]
    BENJAMIN A C, VIEIRA R D, FREIRE J L F, et al. Burst tests on pipeline with long external corrosion[C]//Proceedings of ASME Conference on 2000 3rd International Pipeline Conference. Calgary, Canada:ASME,2000.
    [14]
    CRONIN D S, PICK R J. Experimental database for corroded pipe: evaluation of RSTRENG and B31G[C]//Proceedings of ASME Conference on 2000 3rd International Pipeline Conference.Calgary, Canada:ASME,2000.
    [15]
    ZHU X K, LEIS B N. Theoretical and numerical predictions of burst pressure of pipelines[J]. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2007, 129(4): 644-652.
    [16]
    FREIRE J L F, VIEIRA R D, BENJAMIN A C. Part 1: experimental techniques in the field of pipeline integrity[J]. Experimental Techniques, 2006, 30(4): 44-50.
    [17]
    FREIRE J L F, VIEIRA R D, BENJAMIN A C. Part 2: experimental strain analysis of metal loss defects in pipeline[J]. Experimental Techniques, 2006, 30(5): 42-47.
    [18]
    FREIRE J L F, VIEIRA R D, CASTRO J T P, et al. Part 3: burst tests of pipeline with extensive longitudinal metal loss[J]. Experimental Techniques, 2006, 30(6): 60-65.
    [19]
    KIM W S, KIM Y P, KHO Y T, et al. Full scale burst test and finite element analysis on corroded gas pipeline[C]//Proceedings of ASME Conference on 2002 4th International Pipeline Conference. Calgary, Canada:ASME, 2002.

Catalog

    Article views (5) PDF downloads (3) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return