• 中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库收录期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库来源期刊
Advanced Search
CHEN Yuliang, SHEN Jiayuan, ZHANG Xiang, LI Deming. Electromagnetic Influence Caused by Lightning Strikes on Transmission Lines to Adjacent Pipelines[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2023, 44(5): 57-64. DOI: 10.11973/fsyfh-202305011
Citation: CHEN Yuliang, SHEN Jiayuan, ZHANG Xiang, LI Deming. Electromagnetic Influence Caused by Lightning Strikes on Transmission Lines to Adjacent Pipelines[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2023, 44(5): 57-64. DOI: 10.11973/fsyfh-202305011

Electromagnetic Influence Caused by Lightning Strikes on Transmission Lines to Adjacent Pipelines

More Information
  • Received Date: July 21, 2022
  • A Lightning current generated when towering transmission lines are struck by lightning will flow to oil and gas steel pipelines or generate high induced voltage due to electromagnetic coupling effect, resulting in hazards such as electric shocks to workers, damage to anti-corrosion coatings or ablation of pipes. The evaluation standards and method applicability of lightning current influence on pipelines were sorted out, and numerical simulation and theoretical analysis methods were used to sort out the pipeline risk assessment methods under lightning disturbance from three aspects of personnel safety, coating integrity, and pipe integrity. The qualitative and quantitative assessment criteria for pipeline risks under lightning strike interference were obtained. The interference assessment was carried out by numerical simulation in a case based on the risk assessment criteria. The results showed that when the pipeline 8.47 m from tower grounding was struck by lightning in 100 kA current in soil resistivity of 50 Ω·m, personal safety could be guaranteed and the anti-corrosion coating had low damage risk. According to the qualitative risk assessment criteria, the distance of 8.47 m did not meet the safety distance of Mouse's ionization distance but met the safety distance specified by the Canadian electric power association (CEA), so the risk of pipeline damage was small. According to the quantitative risk assessment criteria, the maximum melted depth of the pipeline is 0.14 mm (about 0.88% of pipe wall thickness), which met the strength requirements of pipeline safe operation.
  • [1]
    张长秀, 毕晓蕾, 刘全桢, 等. 油气管道在雷电流C分量下的损伤特征分析[J]. 实验室研究与探索, 2021, 40(7):45-49, 75.
    [2]
    CHARALAMBOUS C A, DIMITRIOU A, KIOUPIS N, et al. Wall fusion of buried pipelines due to direct lightning strikes:field, laboratory, and simulation investigation of the damaging mechanism[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2020, 35(2):763-773.
    [3]
    KIJIMA H, TAKATO K, MURAKAWA K. Lightning protection for gas-pipelines installed under the ground[J]. International Journal of systems, 2011(1):117-126.
    [4]
    刘宽, 安韵竹, 胡元潮, 等. 电力线路与燃气管道交叉跨越点雷击事故防护研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2020, 16(5):166-171.
    [5]
    史志强, 张浩, 熊肖容, 等. 雷击高压输电线路对邻近输气管道的电磁影响[J]. 高压电器, 2019, 55(1):178-183, 189.
    [6]
    刘乐, 胡元潮, 李勋, 等.电力杆塔接地对邻近油气管道的影响[J]. 油气储运, 2021, 40(6):708-714.
    [7]
    彭珑, 赵媛, 端木林楠, 等. 雷击输电线路时杆塔各处雷电流监测仿真分析[J]. 电网技术, 2014, 38(11):3249-3253.
    [8]
    肖宏峰, 罗日成, 黄军, 等. 雷击交直流同塔输电线路对并行油气管道的电磁影响[J]. 电瓷避雷器, 2021(3):15-21.
    [9]
    LEE S M, SONG H S, KIM Y G. Validation of some protection guidelines for neighboring pipelines against fault currents from power transmission tower[J]. Corrosion Science and Technology, 2007, 6(2):77-81.
    [10]
    QUICKEL G T, BEAVERS J A. Pipeline failure results from lightning strike:act of mother nature[J]. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2011, 11(3):227-232.
    [11]
    VENTURINO P, BOOMAN J N, GONZALEZ M O, et al. Pipeline failures due to lightning[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2016, 64:1-12.
    [12]
    LI Q, LIU X L, WANG L J, et al. Studies on ablation failure on pipeline related to lightning strikes[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2020, 111:104499.
    [13]
    GUMMOW R A, SEGALL S M, FIELTSCH W. Pipeline AC mitigation misconceptions[C]//Proceeding NACE Northern Area Western Conference. Houston, TX:NACE Internationa, 2010.
    [14]
    Canada Association of Petroleum Producer. Influence of High Voltage DC Power Lines on Metallic Pipeline[R].[S.l:s.n.], 2014.
    [15]
    赵晋云, 潘红丽, 高强, 等. 油气管道与高压输电线路距离的相关标准[J]. 油气储运, 2013, 32(1):82-84, 100.
    [16]
    RAKOV V. Bonding versus isolating approaches in lightning protection practice[C]//Proceeding of 29th International Conference on Lightning Protection.[S.l.:s.n], 2008.
    [17]
    SUNDE E D. Earth conduction effects in transmission systems[M]. New York:Dover Publications, 1968:296-298.
    [18]
    WEN X S, FENG Z Q, LU H L, et al. Sparkover observation and analysis of the soil under the impulse current[J]. IET Science, Measurement & Technology, 2016, 10(3):228-233.
    [19]
    MOKHTARI M, GHAREHPETIAN G B. Integration of energy balance of soil ionization in CIGRE grounding electrode resistance model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2018, 60(2):402-413.
    [20]
    ASIMAKOPOULOU F E, GONOS I F, STATHOPULOS I A. Methodologies for determination of soil ionization gradient[J]. Journal of Electrostatics, 2012, 70(5):457-461.
    [21]
    李景丽, 张宇, 贺鹏威, 等. 复杂土壤结构对杆塔接地装置冲击特性影响分析[J]. 电瓷避雷器, 2019(2):1-8.
    [22]
    MOUSA A M. The soil ionization gradient associated with discharge of high currents into concentrated electrodes[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 1994, 9(3):1669-1677.
    [23]
    FIELTSCH W, WINGET B. Mitigation of arcing risks to pipelines due to phase-to-ground faults at adjacent transmission powerline structures[C]//Corrosion 2014. Houston, TX:NACE International, 2014:4389.
    [24]
    FRAZIER M. Predicting pipeline damage from power line faults[C]//Corrosion 2001 Houston, TX:NACE International, 2001:01595.

Catalog

    Article views (11) PDF downloads (3) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return