• 中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库收录期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库来源期刊
Advanced Search
QIN Huimin, ZHANG Tao, DU Yanxia, CHE Kun, LU Minxu. Influence Factors of Coupon Instant-Off Testing Method under Dynamic DC Stray Current Interference[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2023, 44(6): 24-33. DOI: 10.11973/fsyfh-202306005
Citation: QIN Huimin, ZHANG Tao, DU Yanxia, CHE Kun, LU Minxu. Influence Factors of Coupon Instant-Off Testing Method under Dynamic DC Stray Current Interference[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2023, 44(6): 24-33. DOI: 10.11973/fsyfh-202306005

Influence Factors of Coupon Instant-Off Testing Method under Dynamic DC Stray Current Interference

More Information
  • Received Date: April 15, 2021
  • Through field test, the influence of factors such as test piece embedding time, instant-off delay time, coupon buried depth, external interference electric field and reference electrode position on the test results of coupon instant-off method was studied. By comparing the test results under different conditions, the influence laws of different factors were obtained. The results showed that the larger the exposed area of the coupon, the longer it took to reach a stable polarization state, and the longer the shallow buried coupon took to reach a stable polarization state. For the test of the instantaneous instant-off potential of the coupon, a reasonable instant-off delay time should be set . Under the current test conditions, the longest time required for the polarization stability of the coupon was 25 h, and the instant-off delay time of 150 ms was reasonable. The current flowing in the soil would generate a ground potential gradient between the coupon and the reference electrode, which would affect the correct reading of the instant-off potential of the coupon. The error caused by the external electric field could be reduced by reducing the distance between the coupon and the reference electrode.
  • [1]
    ALLAHKARAM S R,ISAKHANI-ZAKARIA M,DERAKHSHANI M,et al.Investigation on corrosion rate and a novel corrosion criterion for gas pipelines affected by dynamic stray current[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2015,26:453-460.
    [2]
    钱建华,闫永贵,李威力.城市轨道交通杂散电流对埋地管线腐蚀的影响[J].腐蚀科学与防护技术,2009,21(3):250-251.
    [3]
    CHEN Z G,QIN C K,TANG J X,et al.Experiment research of dynamic stray current interference on buried gas pipeline from urban rail transit[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2013,15:76-81.
    [4]
    刘杰,杜艳霞,覃慧敏,等.地铁杂散电流对埋地管道的干扰规律[J].腐蚀与防护,2019,40(1):43-47,70.
    [5]
    刘瑶,谭松玲,邢琳琳,等.北京埋地燃气管道地铁杂散电流干扰影响现场检测及规律分析[J].腐蚀科学与防护技术,2019,31(4):429-435.
    [6]
    朱祥剑,杜艳霞,覃慧敏,等.地铁杂散电流干扰下埋地管道管地电位动态波动规律[J].腐蚀与防护,2019,40(12):878-885.
    [7]
    姜有文,刘猛,赵建涛,等.检查片法在阴极保护评价中的问题分析[J].管道技术与设备,2016(5):45-47.
    [8]
    国家能源局.埋地钢质检查片应用技术规范:SY/T 0029—2012[S].北京:石油工业出版社,2012.
    [9]
    NEKOKSA G.Flat cathodic protection test probe:US6060877[P].2000-05-09.
    [10]
    RIEMER D P,ORAZEM M E.Application of boundary element models to predict effectiveness of coupons for accessing cathodic protection of buried structures[J].CORROSION,2000,56(8):794-800.
    [11]
    张丰,齐晓忠,金宏,等.试片断电法在管道阴极保护中的应用[J].油气储运,2013,32(7):760-763.
    [12]
    徐华天,杜艳霞,路民旭,等.极化探头测试埋地管道阴极保护电位的新方法[J].腐蚀科学与防护技术,2013,25(3):238-241.
    [13]
    黄腾飞.埋地管道阴极保护电位参数及电位测试技术研究[D].成都:西南石油学院,2004.
    [14]
    秦莺,宋伟,郑志受,等.辅助试片法管道阴极保护电位的精确测量[J].计量技术,2008(11):35-38.

Catalog

    Article views (9) PDF downloads (7) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return