• 中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库收录期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库来源期刊
Advanced Search
SU Zhihua. Application and Research of Corrosion Data Comprehensive Analysis Method inIntegrity Management of Long-Distance Crude Oil Pipelines[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2023, 44(12): 114-123. DOI: 10.11973/fsyfh-202312018
Citation: SU Zhihua. Application and Research of Corrosion Data Comprehensive Analysis Method inIntegrity Management of Long-Distance Crude Oil Pipelines[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2023, 44(12): 114-123. DOI: 10.11973/fsyfh-202312018

Application and Research of Corrosion Data Comprehensive Analysis Method inIntegrity Management of Long-Distance Crude Oil Pipelines

More Information
  • Received Date: January 12, 2022
  • According to the methods given in Q/SY 1180. 4-2015 and SY/T 0087. 5-2016 criterion, taking a foreign long-distance crude oil pipeline as the research object, the completion data, in-line inspection data, operation and maintenance data, magnetic flux leakage detection, and corrosion protection layer detection, cathodic protection test, excavation verification, corrosion evaluation and integrity evaluation data were collected. 18 types of data related to pipeline integrity management were aligned and the main pipeline corrosion data were comprehensively analyzed. Combining with the elevation along the pipeline, the range of the anti-corrosion coating, the insulation resistance of the anti-corrosion coating and the integrity evaluation, totally 11 internal corrosion defects in the pipeline magnetic flux leakage test and 15 external corrosion defects in the pipeline magnetic flux leakage test that need a positive response and 7 double height pipe sections were identified. For different types of pipeline defects and pipe sections, corresponding risk prevention and control measures were proposed to provide references for the safe operation and integrity management of the pipeline.
  • [1]
    陈朋超, 冯文兴, 燕冰川.油气管道全生命周期完整性管理体系的构建[J].油气储运, 2020, 39(1):40-47.
    [2]
    Managing System Integrity for Hazardous Liquid Pipelines-THIRD EDITION:API RP 1160-2019[S]. 2019.
    [3]
    Draft Document-Petroleum and natural gas industry-Pipeline transportation systems-Pipeline integrity management specification-Part 2:Full-life cycle integrity management for offshore pipeline (ISO/DIS 19345-2:2017); English version prEN ISO 19345-2:2017, only on CD-ROM:DIN EN ISO 19345-2-DRAFT[S]. 2018.
    [4]
    张华兵, 周利剑, 杨祖佩, 等.中石油管道完整性管理标准体系建设与应用[J].石油管材与仪器, 2017, 3(6):1-4.
    [5]
    郑洪龙, 许立伟, 谷雨雷, 等.管道完整性管理效能评价指标体系[J].油气储运, 2012, 31(1):8-12, 19.
    [6]
    吴志平, 蒋宏业, 李又绿, 等.油气管道完整性管理效能评价技术研究[J].天然气工业, 2013, 33(12):131-137.
    [7]
    董绍华, 韩忠晨, 费凡, 等.输油气站场完整性管理与关键技术应用研究[J].天然气工业, 2013, 33(12):117-123.
    [8]
    赵志峰, 文虎, 高炜欣, 等.长输管道完整性管理中的数据挖掘和知识决策[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 31(4):109-114.
    [9]
    DESJARDINS G.Detection of active corrosion from a comparison of ILI runs[C]//20108th International Pipeline Conference, Volume 1..Calgary:ASMEDC, 2010.
    [10]
    王波, 韩昌柴, 刘翼, 等.管道内检测数据与施工资料对齐及应用[J].油气田地面工程, 2018, 37(12):87-90.
    [11]
    JARRAGH A, PRAKASH S, AL-SULAIMAN S, et al.Corrosion and integrity management of a segment of Kuwait oil company's pipeline network[C]//Corrosion 2013.[S.l.]:NACE International, 2013:4221-4235.
    [12]
    王俊强, 何仁洋, 刘哲, 等.中美油气管道完整性管理规范发展现状及差异[J].油气储运, 2018, 37(1):6-14.
    [13]
    李保吉, 冯庆善, 苗绘, 等.建设期管道完整性数据模型及应用[J].管道技术与设备, 2015(6):47-49.
    [14]
    王良军, 李强, 梁菁嬿.长输管道内检测数据比对国内外现状及发展趋势[J].油气储运, 2015, 34(3):233-236.
    [15]
    税碧垣, 杨宝玲. 国内外管道企业标准体系建设现状与思考[J]. 油气储运, 2012, 31(5):326-329.
    [16]
    于航, 李强, 梁菁嬿, 等.在役长输管道腐蚀数据综合分析方法及应用[J].管道技术与设备, 2018(6):10-14, 60.
    [17]
    BRIAN LEIS, STEPHANIE FLAMBERG. Data Integration and Alignment-The Key to Pipeline Integrity Management in An Urban Environment[J]. Pipeline & Gas Journal, 2007, 234(12):18-21.
    [18]
    姜晓红, 洪险峰, 刘争, 等.管道内检测数据对比对完整性评价的影响[J].油气储运, 2016, 35(1):28-31.
    [19]
    孟波, 安超, 鲜俊, 等.输油气管道完整性管理数据采集研究[J].全面腐蚀控制, 2019, 33(10):53-56, 104.
    [20]
    冯庆善, 贾光明, 何淼, 等.关于管道基线检测的理解与探讨[J]. 油气储运, 2015, 34(4):349-353.
    [21]
    孙浩, 帅健.长输管道内检测数据比对方法[J].油气储运, 2017, 36(7):775-780, 794.
    [22]
    STEWART W, KELLER J.Implementation of knowledge portal technology software for pipeline integrity data management[C]//Proceedings of 2004 International Pipeline Conference.Calgary:ASMEDC.2008:631-636.
    [23]
    DESJARDINS G, NICKLE R, SKIBINSKY D, et al.Comparison of in-line inspection service provider magnetic flux leakage (MFL) technology and analytical performance based on multiple runs on pipeline segment[C]//International Pipeline Conference.Calgary:ASMEDC, 2012:89-94.
    [24]
    王丹丹, 林晓, 骆秀媛, 等.海底管道两轮漏磁内检测数据的比对方法[J].船海工程, 2016, 45(3):122-126, 130.
    [25]
    FENG Q S, SUTHERLAND J, GU B, et al. Evolution of triax magnetic flux leakage inspection for mitigation of spiral weld anomalies[C]//8th International Pipeline Conference.Calgary:ASMEDC, 2010.
    [26]
    方学锋, 业成, 于永亮, 等.输油管道外防腐层破损缺陷识别及开挖验证[J].石油化工腐蚀与防护, 2020, 37(4):42-44.
    [27]
    蔡永军, 马涛, 庄楠, 等.基于管道本体特征的内检测开挖验证方法[J].油气储运, 2013, 32(7):767-770.
    [28]
    司海涛, 刘波.管道漏磁检测中缺陷尺寸对漏磁信号的影响[J].石油矿场机械, 2008, 37(9):18-20.
    [29]
    陈文明, 何辅云, 陈琨, 等.石油管道检测中缺陷类型判别方法的研究[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 31(12):1929-1932.
    [30]
    马钢, 白瑞.漏磁管道内检测及其信号识别研究现状及展望[J].工业加热, 2018, 47(5):60-65.
    [31]
    张仕民, 梅旭涛, 王国超, 等.油气管道维抢修方法及技术进展[J].油气储运, 2014, 33(11):1180-1186.
    [32]
    巢栗苹. 用直流电位梯度法测量埋地管道防护层缺陷位置的模拟试验[J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2008, 29(5):257-259.
    [33]
    周冰, 韩文礼, 张盈盈, 等.PE防腐层脱粘对阴极保护电位分布的影响研究[J].天津科技, 2015, 42(10):32-35, 40.
    [34]
    刘正雄, 张勇, 谷坛, 等.双竹线阴极保护电位偏低的原因分析调查[J].石油与天然气化工, 2006, 35(4):314-315, 251.
    [35]
    赵新伟, 张华, 罗金恒.油气管道可接受风险准则研究[J].油气储运, 2016, 35(1):1-6.
    [36]
    石蕾, 郝建斌, 郭正虹, 等.美国油气管道维抢修应急响应程序[J].油气储运, 2010, 29(12):881-884, 874.
    [37]
    唐彦东, 于汐, 刘春平, 等.天然气管道地震风险综合评估基本思路与框架[J].自然灾害学报, 2009, 18(3):135-138.
    [38]
    唐培连, 刘刚, 程梦鹏, 等.西气东输三线中段工程地质灾害防治设计[J].油气储运, 2018, 37(8):930-934.

Catalog

    Article views (11) PDF downloads (9) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return